"We care deeply about issues like safety, well-being and mental health." "I'm sure many of you have found the recent coverage hard to read because it just doesn't reflect the company we know," Zuckerberg said.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg released a statement in October following whistleblower Frances Haugen's testimony in front of a Senate subcommittee about the platform's harmful impact on children and public safety. On Glassdoor, employees expressed concern over unwanted public scrutiny, a lack of action from leadership on platform issues and uncertainty about the company's future. Meta's drop is hardly surprising given the public relations crises it has endured for the past year.
#Stack ranking apple professional#
To be sure, employees lauded Meta, Amazon and Apple for their extensive benefits, professional development opportunities and ability to work on projects with wide-reaching impact - but such reviews weren't prevalent enough to boost their culture scores. "It's not always that the companies are performing poorly, either, but other companies are just outpacing them," he adds. These companies have had a tumultuous past year, from privacy concerns to underperforming stocks, that would negatively affect the employee experience, Comparably CEO Jason Nazar tells CNBC Make It. Amazon did not make the list for 2021 or 2022. When it comes to Civilization VI: Gathering Storm, the M1 scores 38 fps at max settings at 1440x900p, while the M2 chip scores 51 fps at the exact resolution and settings.It's not the first ranking the tech giants have fallen in this year, either: Meta and Apple both dropped more than 20 spots on Glassdoor's annual ranking of the best places to work in the U.S., from No.11 to No.
#Stack ranking apple pro#
The M1 Max averages about 74 fps, M1 Pro averages 39 fps, and the M2 averages 25 fps. The M1 Ultra, naturally, comes out ahead on this one thanks to its gi-normous 64-core GPU, averaging about 109 fps in the Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark. Drop down the resolution to 1200p on very high settings, you can get a playable 25 fps on the M2.ĭropping that down a bit to 1920p wide (1080p on the M1 Ultra and 1200p on the MacBooks), the M2 comes up shortest of the four chips we have comparable scores for: the M1 Pro, M1 Max, M1 Ultra, and M2. The easiest comparison is the M1 vs M2, which at max settings on 1800p, scores 9 fps for the M1 vs M2’s 12 fps, which is a 25% increase.
#Stack ranking apple mac#
The winner when it comes to playing the best Mac games is definitely the M1 Ultra, thanks to its 64-core GPU, which can get up to 109 fps on Shadow of the Tomb Raider at very high at 1080p. While Macs might not be known for gaming, that perception is changing. Notably, it also beats the M1 Pro in Photoshop, which scores an 806, though it falls slightly behind the M1 Max which scores an 887 in the same Photoshop benchmark. This means the Apple M1 Ultra is about 65% faster than the M2, but again, this is an expected result given that the M1 Ultra is a desktop-class processor, while the M2 is a hybrid desktop/mobile processor.Ĭompared to the M1, which scores a 354 on PugetBench’s Adobe Premiere Pro benchmark, The M2 comes out about 56% better than the M1, and on the Photoshop benchmark, it comes out about 26% higher than the M1. The Apple M2 meanwhile, scored 817 and 552, respectively, on the same tests. It scored 1,010 in PugetBench for Adobe Photoshop and 1,354 for PugetBench for Adobe Premiere Pro.
When it comes to PugetBench for Adobe Photoshop and PugetBench for Adobe Premiere Pro, it’s a similar result with the M1 Ultra coming out way ahead of the pack, which is expected. This is also about 57% of the speed of the M1 Ultra, which is not bad at all for a mobile workstation. In terms of Apple-to-Apple comparisons, this is about 15% faster than its M1 predecessor, which is a solid gen-on-gen improvement. The M2 chip did an admirable job, encoding the same video at 54 fps, while the M1 chip encoded it at 47 fps. In Handbrake, the M1 Ultra encoded Tears of Steel at into at about 94 frames per second (fps), while the next closest, the M1 Max and M1 Pro, were able to encode that same video at 76 fps. In terms of creative benchmarks, it’s no surprise that the M1 Ultra packed into the Mac Studio is the absolute winner here. Creative workloads are what make MacBooks some of the best laptops around, so how the M-series chips handle various tasks is an important matter. Well, what about creative performance? This is the Apple M-series bread and butter, after all, so this is what a lot of people are going to want to look at.
0 kommentar(er)
